Sunday, October 30, 2011

About LEED

What is LEED?

LEED, or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is an internationally-recognized green building certification system. Developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) in March 2000, LEED provides building owners and operators with a framework for identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building design, construction, operations and maintenance solutions.

What are the components of LEED?

The components of the process include a balanced and transparent committee structure, technical advisory groups that ensure scientific consistency and rigor, opportunities for stakeholder comment and review, member ballot of new rating systems, and fair and open appeals.

What are LEED rating systems?

LEED promotes sustainable building and development practices through a suite of rating systems that recognize projects that implement strategies for better environmental and health performance. The LEED rating systems are developed through an open, consensus-based process led by LEED committees, diverse groups of volunteers representing a cross-section of the building and construction industry.

LEED Project Profiles

There are many types of projects to which LEED can be applied.  LEED projects apply to new construction, existing buildings, commercial interiors, core and shell construction,  neighborhood development, retail buildings, schools and homes.

What is core and shell construction?

Core and shell covers base building elements such as structure, envelope and the HVAC system. LEED for Core & Shell is designed to be complementary to the LEED for Commercial Interiors rating system, as both rating systems establish green building criteria for developers, owners and tenants.

Core and Shell project example

An office building in Golden, Colorado earned a platinum rating in LEED for a core and shell construction in 2007.  The project site includes a pervious pathway, bioswales for managing stormwater and native grasses that require little irrigation. This reduced irrigation—combined with dual-flush toilets, waterless urinals, low-flow showerheads, and low-flow faucets with automatic controls—was expected to reduce the project’s use of potable water by 47%. A low-velocity underfloor system provides heating, cooling, and ventilation to most spaces. Perimeter areas are conditioned by radiant heaters and chilled beams. Other energy-efficiency strategies include low-emissivity glazing, an outside-air economizer, and a sophisticated building-automation system. Signature Centre was expected to use 37% less energy than a comparable conventional building, saving more than $80,000 each year. The project team located all air-supply intakes on the building roof, away from traffic exhaust, and ensured that all restrooms, janitor closets, and kitchens vent directly outside. The team also selected paints, adhesives, sealants, carpeting, and composite-wood products for their low chemical emissions. Additionally, more than 20% of all materials, by cost, were extracted, processed, and manufactured within 500 miles of the project site, and half of all wood was certified to Forest Stewardship Council standards.
http://www.usgbc.org/Default.aspx

Monday, October 3, 2011

Can we make a sustainable plan for the Netherlands?

Similar to McKay, the future plan in this blog took a simplified approach for now & left out the politics involved in switching to renewable energy sources.

We used transporting of  humans & goods, heating, electricity, and the electricity efficiency factor for the consumption side. We used the Netherland's possible renewables, nuclear, better electrical efficiency, & the possiblity of buying renewables from other countries for the production side.

We showed the current consumption of the Netherlands and a breakdown into 4 main categories. Due to possible improvements in efficiency, we showed a future consumption breakdown as well.

Some key ideas that went into this were:

Electrify transport (eliminate fossil fuels, more-efficient and need green electricity)
Electrify heating of air and water using heat pumps.
Green electricity comes from countries renewables, clean coal, nuclear, and other countries renewables

Assume electrification makes transport 4 times more efficient but economic growth cancels some of that out. So we used 1/2 energy consumption for transport.

Heating consumption reduced by improved insulation, improving control of temperature, and improving efficiency of heat pumps. We assumed this would make heating and cooling 25% more efficient overall.

Below is a breakdown followed by a new plan for the Netherlands:







Resource: McKay Chapter 27

Energy Use in the Netherlands – where does it go?

Here, we revisit the red stack for the Netherlands to sum up where all the energy goes.

Let's start with the transportation aspect of the Netherlands energy consumption.  10.82 kWh/day per person is used when transporting stuff, 14.55 kWh/day is used on plane travel and 32.94 kWh/day is used on automobiles.  The total consumption of the Netherlands is about 150 kWh/day so transportation accounts for about 39% of the Netherlands energy consumption.

Now we'll observe how residential and commercial energy consumption contributes to the total.  Heating and cooling in the Netherlands consumes 26.7 kWh/day while light only consumes 4.2 kWh/day.  We can now conclude that residential and commercial consumption accounts for about 21% of the Netherlands energy consumption.

Last, we examine how significant industrial energy consumption is in the Netherlands.  The two main factors of industrial energy consumption are food and stuff and they use 13.76 kWh/day and 46.79 kWh/day, respectively.  Industrial energy consumption accounts for 40% of the total energy consumption in the Netherlands. 

Can we grow our economies but still decrease energy use?







In theory we should be able to grow our economies but still decrease energy use. This will take a while to impliment all the new policies and to condition people into being more green.

While we work towards this, it is not possible to grow economies and still decrease energy in the short term, but a long term plan is possible.

Lets understand energy sources some more: Table



 http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/industrie-energie/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2007/2007-2187-wm.htm

convert Euro to dollars

http://www.nrel.gov/

http://energylinx.co.uk/gas_meter_conversion.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density

Carbon Capture & Storage-Netherlands

Economy of the Netherlands

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf107.html

Energy Information Administration

What is the current profile of energy use in the US and the World? Can the current energy consumption profile last?

The United States' energy consumption is approximately 250 kWh/d per person and was determined from a chart provided be our professor.

The world energy consumption was a bit harder to calculate. It was first found that the energy consumption in 2008 for the world was 474 exajoules.

1 exajoule = 2.78 * 10^11 kWh
474 exajoules = 1.3167 * 10^14 kWh

Assume the population of the world in 2008 was 6.9 billion people.

(1.3167 * 10^14 / 6.9 * 10^9) / 365 days = 52.3 kWh/d per person

The current energy consumption profile in the United States and in the world can not last and will not last unless changes are made.

Transportation and Decision Making. Is Energy a Personal Issue or a Public Issue?

Most people would agree that energy is a public issue rather than a personal issue.  Our use of fossil fuels in transportation will not decrease because of individual choices.  A decrease in consumption will be seen when a drastic change is made in how we travel.  Right now everyone can do their own part to make a difference but in reality they are not even making a dent. Things will start happening when people are made to do their part. For example, at some point the public will not have the personal choice to buy a hybrid or electric car because all cars will be hybrid or electric.  If/when this happens everyone will be making a difference because a change has been made on a public level rather than a personal level.

Real Issues vs Fake Issues

The main issue, if it was unclear, is our dependence on fossil fuels and our lack of renewable energy sources.  This is a real issue that needs to be resolved.  McKay does a good job of describing fake issues that keep this from happening.  These fake issues include how geothermal is immature, offshore wind could affect radar, shallow offshore wind can kill birds, normal wind takes up too much space and solar heating doesn't belong in the street.  McKay shows statistics about the causes of bird deaths to prove that it is a fake issue.

As you can see, the number of birds being killed by windmills is negligible and a worthwhile sacrifice.  The fake issues will need to be acknowledged and put to rest if the world wants to achieve a greater goal.

What is Feasible?

McKay concludes his red stack/green stack by talking about much energy Britain could feasibly get from renewable sources.  He expresses his frustration towards the public and how their concerns make renewable energy sources seem like an inconvenience.
He concludes that only 18 kWh/d per person could be generated using renewables and that 125 kWh/d per person is consumed.  It is clear that two things need to happen if we can expect to power our world with renewable energy.  The public needs to embrace new forms of energy production, even if they are a minor inconvenience, and consumption needs to decrease.  If these things happen it may be feasible to power our world using renewable energy.


Sunday, October 2, 2011

What is the embodied energy in an apple?

First lets define embodied energy.
Embodied energy is a term used to describe all the energy that goes into the life cycle of a product including manufacturing, transporting, and disposal.

Using California:
First, we consider that apples are sourced within California during the harvest season. Thus only minimal storage time is required, resulting in no yield loss. The energy consumed during storage and transport is 3.4 MJ/kg, resulting in .233 CO


Local apples that are sold out of season:

  The embodied energy is 6.8 MJ/kg of energy used, resulting in .431kg CO

Apples grown in New Zealand and shipped to California in season

Embodied Energy of an Apple
      Figure 1. Embodied Energy of an apple-in season. Units are MJ/kg
       Fig 2. Embodied Energy of an apple-out of season. Units are MJ/kg
     Fig 3. Embodied Energy of an imported apple-in season. Units-MJ/kg

Transport and storage of these imported, in season apples takes 4.6 MJ/kg of energy, resulting in .34 CO

Apples grown in New Zealand and shipped to California out of season-long term storage

     Fig 4. Embodied Energy of an imported apple-out of season-Units MJ/kg

8.23 MJ/kg of energy used during storage and transport, resulting in .56 kg CO

we assume California apple production has an energy profile of 1.2 MJ/kg. In reality, such energy usage is likely to vary between producers based on factors such as irrigation usage and harvesting techniques

Comparing the Energy Intensity of Scenarios:
MJoules required to Produce, Transport and Store 1 Kilogram of Saleable Apples

         Figure 5. Total Embodied Energy of an Apple

Energy Out:A small apple has about 53 calories and weighs 3.6 ounces.
3.6 ounces = .102kg
53 calories = .220MJ
Therefore the available energy from eating an apple is .220MJ/ .102kg = 2.15MJ/kg
However we only use about 20% of that energy to do actual work.
Energy Out = .43MJ/kg

Summary: Grow your own apples or you are wasting way more energy than you get back from the apple.
                If you care, grow an apple tree in your yard. If not, drink a beer.